- #Db browser for sqlite dark mode how to#
- #Db browser for sqlite dark mode code#
- #Db browser for sqlite dark mode windows#
3 years, 7 months ago It might solve this issue but it is not recommended because it could lead to security issue.
#Db browser for sqlite dark mode windows#
I think windows will ask the user if he/she want to compress files in order to obtain space if the user says yes then the read-only database issue might arise. In my case (A desktop app), it was related to Windows Compressing the database due to the main hard disk getting too low in space. 3 years, 10 months ago What makes you think the file should belong to the Apache user/group? 3 years, 7 months ago This should be marked as the answer. I prefer not to have to explain the stupidity that led to this conclusion. 4 years, 5 months ago I think he meant from another application 4 years, 3 months ago I can add to this list: the database file was replaced during usage.
#Db browser for sqlite dark mode how to#
5 years, 7 months ago Why would you try to access a database from another database? 5 years, 7 months ago What are the security implications? 5 years, 7 months ago How is this different from adrian's answer? 5 years, 7 months ago Read/write permissions for whom? 5 years, 5 months ago How to check and set that? 5 years, 5 months ago perfect answer ! 5 years, 1 month ago It works as quick solution but needs to dig in for better secured solution later 5 years ago This will grant all permissions to all users, which is probably not what you want from a security standpoint. I always forget sudo :P 5 years, 8 months ago You just changed the group, not the user (which is fine, and probably better than changing the user, but your answer is misleading). one up vote for for :) 6 years, 7 months ago First bullet for me:D 6 years, 6 months ago Which is quite bad. 12 years, 11 months ago I've seen this in a web app where I forgot to set the GID on the database file and the "I modified the question to give more detail and be easier to read. 12 years, 11 months ago I'd place my bid on the third bullet - the directory containing the DB file should also be writable so the lock file can be created. ** defensive mode, and the current sqlite3_prepare()Ħ months ago Related Topics sqlite Comments 12 years, 11 months ago Does the user running sqlite3 (or whatever you are using to execute the query) have write permissions to the db? Have you double checked file ownership? 12 years, 11 months ago I'm sure they have permission to do it. ** 3) The table is a shadow table, the database connection is in ** part of a nested parse and writable_schema pragma has not ** 1) It is a virtual table and no implementation of the xUpdate method ** A table is read-only if any of the following are true:
#Db browser for sqlite dark mode code#
In SQLite source code we can see a function named tabIsReadOnly with this comment: /* Return true if table pTab is read-only. So I think our friend user143482 is trying to acesse a "read only" table. So, it's seems hard to belive this can be a "chmod" problem, because if the file is read only, even creating table would be impossible as SQLite would be unable to write the "sqlite_master" data. In this db file we have of course the user tables but also the system tables so "sqlite_master" for example which contain the definiton of the tables. When I look at the data on the flash of the ESP I notice there is only one file for the whole db (there is also a temp file). I'm using SQLite on ESP32 and all answers here are "very strange". It worked apparently there just needed to be enough time for the resources to flush out to disk.
If the create/drop failed, we waited for 50 ms and tried again, repeating until we succeeded or 5 seconds elapsed. We got around this by running a test write query against the db upon opening (e.g., creating then dropping a table with a silly name). We speculated that the problem was due to the fact that Windows (or the sqlite implementation under windows) doesn't always immediately clean up up file resources upon closing of a file.
We eventually discovered that the threads that were failing were only those that were trying to open the database immediately after another thread had closed it (within 3 ms).
Our system was suffering this problem, and it definitely wasn't a permissions issue, since the program itself would be able to open the database as writable from many threads most of the time, but occasionally (only on Windows, not on OSX), a thread would get these errors even though all the other threads in the program were having no difficulties.
0 kommentar(er)
